Comments on: C++ vs. Objective-C http://outerlevel.com/blog/2006/06/10/c-vs-objective-c/ Building a MicroISV Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:13:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 By: Jon Trainer http://outerlevel.com/blog/2006/06/10/c-vs-objective-c/#comment-605 Jon Trainer Sat, 10 Jun 2006 20:00:12 +0000 http://outerlevel.com/blog/2006/06/10/c-vs-objective-c/#comment-605 I've never used Smalltalk, but I've heard it described this way several times. The article I referred to above actually does describe objective-c as follows: <blockquote> On the other hand, Objective-C is a blend of C and Smalltalk. Most of it is straight C, with embedded Smalltalk. </blockquote> I’ve never used Smalltalk, but I’ve heard it described this way several times. The article I referred to above actually does describe objective-c as follows:

On the other hand, Objective-C is a blend of C and Smalltalk. Most of it is straight C, with embedded Smalltalk.

]]> By: Marc http://outerlevel.com/blog/2006/06/10/c-vs-objective-c/#comment-604 Marc Sat, 10 Jun 2006 18:32:04 +0000 http://outerlevel.com/blog/2006/06/10/c-vs-objective-c/#comment-604 In my limited exposure to Objective-C, it always seemed like a combination of C with Smalltalk. Is that accurate? In my limited exposure to Objective-C, it always seemed like a combination of C with Smalltalk. Is that accurate?

]]>