<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LicenseKeeper 1.1.2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://outerlevel.com/blog/2007/05/25/licensekeeper-112/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://outerlevel.com/blog/2007/05/25/licensekeeper-112/</link>
	<description>Building a MicroISV</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Taylor</title>
		<link>http://outerlevel.com/blog/2007/05/25/licensekeeper-112/#comment-835</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 15:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outerlevel.com/blog/2007/05/25/licensekeeper-112/#comment-835</guid>
		<description>Hm.  Just came across this app and downloaded it.  It looks promising.  What a great idea!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm.  Just came across this app and downloaded it.  It looks promising.  What a great idea!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Trainer</title>
		<link>http://outerlevel.com/blog/2007/05/25/licensekeeper-112/#comment-831</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Trainer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 12:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outerlevel.com/blog/2007/05/25/licensekeeper-112/#comment-831</guid>
		<description>Gale:  Thanks for the feedback.  

LicenseKeeper does not associate two applications with the same name and different version as the same product.  This is so you can store multiple copies of the same product -- in cases where you may have purhcased multiple licenses or when newer versions may require updated license information.

However, I do like the idea of providing a "Copy" feature to allow for copying from one product version to an other.

If you want to update the version of your application, you can just edit the version field to match the updraded app's new version number.  Or, you can also drag the application onto the existing entry's icon on the right side of the window and it will update the app name, version, and any other info it can detect from the application.

Again, here you point out a possible enhanement.  Looks like a new menu option to update an entry's version information could be helpful.

As to the "Upgrading" window, it looks like you may have added some data during a library upgrade process.  This should not be possible as LicenseKeeper will not open your library until the upgrade is complete.  Did you somehow run two copies of LK at the same time?

Finally, I'm not sure what you mean by my "BLOG Archive doesn't work well either".  Did you run into a specific issue?  If you are refering to the multiple times you submitted these comments, I see your confusion.  The blog software is set to not display comments from a first-time poster until they are approved by me.  This is to cut down on comment-spam (I get a ton of these).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gale:  Thanks for the feedback.  </p>
<p>LicenseKeeper does not associate two applications with the same name and different version as the same product.  This is so you can store multiple copies of the same product &#8212; in cases where you may have purhcased multiple licenses or when newer versions may require updated license information.</p>
<p>However, I do like the idea of providing a &#8220;Copy&#8221; feature to allow for copying from one product version to an other.</p>
<p>If you want to update the version of your application, you can just edit the version field to match the updraded app&#8217;s new version number.  Or, you can also drag the application onto the existing entry&#8217;s icon on the right side of the window and it will update the app name, version, and any other info it can detect from the application.</p>
<p>Again, here you point out a possible enhanement.  Looks like a new menu option to update an entry&#8217;s version information could be helpful.</p>
<p>As to the &#8220;Upgrading&#8221; window, it looks like you may have added some data during a library upgrade process.  This should not be possible as LicenseKeeper will not open your library until the upgrade is complete.  Did you somehow run two copies of LK at the same time?</p>
<p>Finally, I&#8217;m not sure what you mean by my &#8220;BLOG Archive doesn&#8217;t work well either&#8221;.  Did you run into a specific issue?  If you are refering to the multiple times you submitted these comments, I see your confusion.  The blog software is set to not display comments from a first-time poster until they are approved by me.  This is to cut down on comment-spam (I get a ton of these).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gale Koewing</title>
		<link>http://outerlevel.com/blog/2007/05/25/licensekeeper-112/#comment-830</link>
		<dc:creator>Gale Koewing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 10:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outerlevel.com/blog/2007/05/25/licensekeeper-112/#comment-830</guid>
		<description>P.S.
 You're BLOG Archive doesn't work well either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S.<br />
 You&#8217;re BLOG Archive doesn&#8217;t work well either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gale Koewing</title>
		<link>http://outerlevel.com/blog/2007/05/25/licensekeeper-112/#comment-828</link>
		<dc:creator>Gale Koewing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 09:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outerlevel.com/blog/2007/05/25/licensekeeper-112/#comment-828</guid>
		<description>I downloaded LicenseKeeper a few days ago and decided to conduct a trial using 2 "serial #-requiring programs" on L/K 1.1.2. (I'm a mere yoozer so I can't get very technical, but I'll try to describe some of my experiences FYI.) After installing the 2 programs to L/K I noticed updates were available for each: good test, thought I. The first, a WP called "Mellel" installed nicely but I got duplicates on L/K when I did the update, and not all the data I'd attached to the original transferred to the update.  I manually moved the missing data before deleting the old version and proceeded to #2, "Notebook" by Circus Ponies. This one has left behind a small window titled "LicenseKeeper" which encloses the phrase "Library upgrade completed" and a progress bar that appears to have hung at ≈15% completion. The completed bit of the bar is blue and "wiggly" if you click anywhere within the window it but goes grey if the cursor is used elsewhere (The remainder of the window is always all grayed out, with no way to close it.) I don't have a clue whether any of this is of any value to you, but here it is for you to do with what you please.  Sincerely,  Gale K.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I downloaded LicenseKeeper a few days ago and decided to conduct a trial using 2 &#8220;serial #-requiring programs&#8221; on L/K 1.1.2. (I&#8217;m a mere yoozer so I can&#8217;t get very technical, but I&#8217;ll try to describe some of my experiences FYI.) After installing the 2 programs to L/K I noticed updates were available for each: good test, thought I. The first, a WP called &#8220;Mellel&#8221; installed nicely but I got duplicates on L/K when I did the update, and not all the data I&#8217;d attached to the original transferred to the update.  I manually moved the missing data before deleting the old version and proceeded to #2, &#8220;Notebook&#8221; by Circus Ponies. This one has left behind a small window titled &#8220;LicenseKeeper&#8221; which encloses the phrase &#8220;Library upgrade completed&#8221; and a progress bar that appears to have hung at ≈15% completion. The completed bit of the bar is blue and &#8220;wiggly&#8221; if you click anywhere within the window it but goes grey if the cursor is used elsewhere (The remainder of the window is always all grayed out, with no way to close it.) I don&#8217;t have a clue whether any of this is of any value to you, but here it is for you to do with what you please.  Sincerely,  Gale K.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
